On Apr  9, 2003, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> wrote:

> An architecture can't point at anything tied to the lifetime of an
> instance of a BFD.

tm_print_insn_info doesn't seem to be very tied to a gdbarch, anyway.
To wit, note the bug fix in this revised patch.  Explicitly setting
the ABI to a non-default one, then back, then the non-default one
again, would result the wrong tm_print_insn_info settings.  This works
now, and also disassembles in accordance with gdb's notion of the
current ABI.  Assuming tm_print_insn_info is actually the right thing
to use, of course.  Ok to install?