From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17633 invoked by alias); 20 May 2002 11:22:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17610 invoked from network); 20 May 2002 11:22:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO potter.sfbay.redhat.com) (205.180.83.107) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 May 2002 11:22:46 -0000 Received: from free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (vpn3-3.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.25.3]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4KBL0v29764; Mon, 20 May 2002 04:21:01 -0700 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4KBMQ903794; Mon, 20 May 2002 08:22:26 -0300 To: Joern Rennecke Cc: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, binutils@sources.redhat.com, Nick Clifton , hp@bitrange.com, thorpej@wasabisystems.com Subject: Re: print_insn_sh cleanup References: <20020511115603.W3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <20020513082324.R3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <15584.11203.728429.774659@localhost.redhat.com> <15585.5715.936570.74188@localhost.redhat.com> <15585.10835.680930.43907@localhost.redhat.com> <3CE2B34F.EAAEF3F8@superh.com> <15587.63152.235989.94659@localhost.redhat.com> <3CE4FA74.196833F8@superh.com> <15589.2932.876159.694148@localhost.redhat.com> <3CE51671.4342DA12@superh.com> From: Alexandre Oliva Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 04:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3CE51671.4342DA12@superh.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00812.txt.bz2 On May 17, 2002, Joern Rennecke wrote: > Elena Zannoni wrote: >> The gdb part is approved. (Of course this should go in after/at the same time >> the opcodes are committed). > Thanks. I've committed the whole lot together. Did you run check in binutils too? It's badly hosed at the moment; all SH64 tests in a sh64-elf build with --target_board=sh-hms-sim fail because the disassembler is printing SHmedia instructions as if they were SHcompact. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer