From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26955 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2006 12:05:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 26947 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2006 12:05:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Mar 2006 12:05:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k24C5jaH024075 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 07:05:45 -0500 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.156]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k24C5j102790; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 07:05:45 -0500 Received: from free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (vpn50-43.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.43]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k24C5iNG005116; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 07:05:44 -0500 Received: from free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br [127.0.0.1]) by free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k24C5hqo027710; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:05:43 -0300 Received: (from aoliva@localhost) by free.oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k24C5hFS027709; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:05:43 -0300 To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jakub@redhat.com Subject: Re: add support for =?iso-8859-1?Q?`S=B4?= augmentation in dwarf2 debug info References: <200603041039.k24AdDib021986@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Alexandre Oliva Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 14:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200603041039.k24AdDib021986@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (Mark Kettenis's message of "Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:39:13 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.18 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00095.txt.bz2 On Mar 4, 2006, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> From: Alexandre Oliva >> Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 12:18:43 -0300 >> (a) remove machine-specific code that does so, when the >> augmentation is widely available > Hmm, removing the machine-specific code won't be possible for quite a > long time I think Agreed. > Here it the testcases are really Linux-specific (and yuck, that i386 > sigaction hack is ugly). Hopefully they're not too fragile. Jakub, is there any reason why you made it that way? Could we perhaps use a more portable construct for the testcase? Having no idea of why you wrote it that way, it's hard for me to tell. > Could you please change bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu into bug-gdb@gnu.org > before checking this in? Uhh... And how about updating the FSF address while at that? :-) Sure, will do, thanks for catching that. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Secretary for FSF Latin America http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}