From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Will Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Patch to provide m68k simulator to gdb
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 10:07:00 -0000
Message-id: <o5u2566ab3.fsf@toenail.toronto.redhat.com>
References: <3A9C3128.A52307A@redhat.com> <3A9D2941.ECA95C7E@cygnus.com> <3AA40408.1A30B245@redhat.com> <3AA41929.7AD57C98@cygnus.com> <3AA50E7C.D8FF5E76@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-03/msg00114.html

Will Cohen <wcohen@redhat.com> writes:

: [...]
: > If these are the register numbers being passed in via
: > sim_{fetch,store}_register() then they should be defined
: > include/sim-m68k.h.
: 
: If that's the way to do it okay.  I only saw include/sim-d10v.h there.
: None of the other simulators followed this approach. I was emulating
: what I saw in the vast majority of the simulators.

FWIW, I agree with Will.  The sim-d10v.h, while not a bad idea, is a
very lonely and rather old precedent to become required of new ports.


- FChE