From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Simple but crucial bug fix to gdb
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 20:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <o57kywdhvp.fsf@touchme.toronto.redhat.com>
References: <3.0.5.32.20010530142745.01470ec0@pophost.pdxuxbre.lmc.com> <20010530173650.A21397@redhat.com> <3B15711D.BEA4B77E@cygnus.com> <npvgmimcih.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <3B1638A2.79AE4BCF@redhat.com> <npelt5me4f.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <20010531194656.A27403@redhat.com> <87ofs9hw29.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2001-05/msg00523.html

Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com> writes:

: [...]
: However, we should *never* see a case where pst is NULL, and
: textlow_not_set is 1, at the point we see a function.
: [...]

Would a gdb_assert() to this effect satisfy all sides?

- FChE