From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10388 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2002 17:43:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10377 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 17:43:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 17:43:44 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 6D4555EA11; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:43:42 -0500 (EST) To: Petr Sorfa Cc: "gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH] DWARF support for .debug_loc offsets References: <3D2DB435.AC2C6DA0@caldera.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3D2DB435.AC2C6DA0@caldera.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00231.txt.bz2 A procedural nit: putting "PATCH" in the subject line means by convention that you've committed, or are about to commit, the patch in your message. If you're submitting a patch for approval, you should put "RFA" in your subject. "RFC" and "WIP" I *think* both mean that you're just asking for comments, but you plan to revise the patch before really submitting it ("RFA").