From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>, msnyder@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ac131313@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] enum enable
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:45:00 -0000
Message-id: <nppuazwirr.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010717100642.27733G-100000@is>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00425.html

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> In addition to Andrew's request to change that, GCC 2.7.2.1 barfs if
> it sees the declaration of a member `enable' together with a prototype
> of a function `enable' in the same compilation unit.  In my case, the
> function is declared in one of the system headers, so I guess GCC sees
> it first and protests when the same identifier appears in a struct.

You've *got* to be kidding.

So, the following program gets an error?

extern int foo (void);

struct bar
{
  int foo;
};