From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] linespec.c change to stop "malformed template specification" error
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 08:40:00 -0000
Message-id: <npofs01emo.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
References: <87ofsldrgr.fsf@dynamic-addr-83-177.resnet.rochester.edu> <15134.47162.825017.119342@kwikemart.cygnus.com> <npg0dd2b20.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <87g0dc7u5w.fsf@cgsoftware.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-06/msg00126.html

Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com> writes:
> Though i don't believe the ternary operator is allowed there, gcc
> certainly doesn't like it.

It should be.  It's a constant expression in C, anyway.  And it would
seem to be under Stroustrup's (rather hand-wavy) Section C.5, too.