From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26809 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2002 19:37:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26704 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2002 19:37:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2002 19:37:03 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id E65F95E9DE; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 14:38:37 -0500 (EST) To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Jason Merrill , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: function pointer stabs (was Re: RFA: MI tests: tolerate prototypes) References: <20020203210609.E5E035E9DE@zwingli.cygnus.com> <20020203180133.C26302@nevyn.them.org> <20020205202132.A17384@nevyn.them.org> <20020208104402.A15801@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20020208104402.A15801@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > But the only thing we need that information for AFAIK is curiousity. > We don't really need to know if the function was originally prototyped > if we know how it should be called. Remember, we can only glean that info from *definitions*. We don't have it for function pointers. > For function TYPES, there's vestigial support for ignoring an os9k > prototype, but no support for the Sun prototypes. I stand corrected. > Should we add this, or write it off? Oif! Let's add it. It can't be that hard.