From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27813 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2001 03:32:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27764 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 03:32:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2001 03:32:27 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 1EE865E9D8; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:33:44 -0500 (EST) To: Jackie Smith Cashion Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: RFA: d10v sizeof (long long) References: <3C0C1A14.58B9D2E9@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 19:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Jackie Smith Cashion's message of Mon, 03 Dec 2001 18:34:28 -0600 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 Jackie Smith Cashion writes: > The following patch changes the size of the d10v long long from 4 to 8 > to agree with the d10v gcc. You know, I don't think the D10v is maintained. I think this means you can just go ahead and commit changes to d10v-tdep.c. Of course, we're happy to look things over.