From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8686 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2002 23:57:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8619 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2002 23:57:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2002 23:57:49 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 436FC5E9DE; Tue, 5 Feb 2002 18:59:24 -0500 (EST) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Fix sparc-specific MI tests References: <20020203044322.A6F3D5E9DE@zwingli.cygnus.com> <200202031013.MAA00578@is.elta.co.il> From: Jim Blandy Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 15:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200202031013.MAA00578@is.elta.co.il> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii writes: > > From: Jim Blandy > > Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 23:43:22 -0500 (EST) > > > > (sparc_register_tests): Expand floating-point number regexp to > > recognize NaN values, too. > > If we are going to support NaN's, should we support Inf's as well? Yes. I didn't see any of those, so I wasn't sure what to write. Someone just need to hack the `float' pattern appropriately.