From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22755 invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2002 23:45:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22629 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2002 23:45:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2002 23:45:09 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 384D95E9DE; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 18:45:08 -0500 (EST) To: Stan Shebs Cc: Neil Booth , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: RFC: C/C++ preprocessor macro support for GDB References: <20020318072916.GB14970@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20020318184525.GC19897@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <3C9643B8.334D7812@apple.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 15:45:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3C9643B8.334D7812@apple.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00328.txt.bz2 Neil Booth writes: > > Thanks --- I'd very much appreciate that help. I'll write you > > privately. > > Please don't! I'd like to participate, and others might too. Okay! I was assuming it would be boring traffic for the GCC folks. I don't have any particular wish to keep it private. Stan Shebs writes: > As someone who has had much of his time consumed by keeping > another preprocessor (Apple's cpp-precomp) in sync with GNU cpp, > I think we really should try hard to avoid duplicate macro > expanders. Absolutely. In my first post, I marked "does not use libcpp" as a bug, and the first one in the list.