From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
To: <green@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jim Blandy" <jimb@cygnus.com>, <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: abstract C++ ABI dependencies
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 16:39:00 -0000
Message-id: <npg0exzx1t.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
References: <NEBBKJDPKLNNENPPIHCPCEJILBAA.green@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-04/msg00228.html

"Anthony Green" <green@redhat.com> writes:
> Jim wrote in gdb/jv-typeprint.c:
> > ! 		  is_full_physname_constructor =
> > is_constructor_name (physname) != 0 || is_destructor_name (physname) != 0;
> 
> Actually, it didn't look exactly like that.  My mailer is munging it because
> it was too long.  The patch is fine by me as long as the formatting is
> changed.
> 
> I also find "is_constructor_name (physname) || is_destructor_name
> (physname)" easier to read, but to each his own...

I've fixed this; I'll post a revised patch soon.