From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17476 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2002 21:05:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17469 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2002 21:05:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2002 21:05:09 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id E0C0B5EA11; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:05:07 -0500 (EST) To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Daniel Berlin , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside of CFI References: <20020403000242.A31097@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 13:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20020403000242.A31097@nevyn.them.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 To get back to the issue at hand: Daniel B., if you can tweak the Dwarf expression evaluator into a form that Uli is willing to incorporate into his libdwarf, then that's a pretty good test of its indpendence from GDB's internals, in my view. Actually changing GDB to use (anybody's) libdwarf is a whole separate project --- it could be worth pursuing, but it's not our (or at least my) top priority.