From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Cc: msnyder@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ac131313@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] enum enable
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:15:00 -0000
Message-id: <npelrew41s.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010717100642.27733G-100000@is> <nppuazwirr.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <200107180700.KAA12466@is.elta.co.il>
X-SW-Source: 2001-07/msg00447.html

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> [Dig, dig] and it looks like this is expected: my references indicate
> that enumeration constants and function names belong to the same
> namespace in C programs.

Right.  The changes I asked about were all renamings of *structure*
members, not enum members.  Structure members are supposed to be in
per-type namespaces; I was astonished to hear some version of GCC was
having problems with that.  But it wasn't.

I can go re-patch, recompile, and send you the error messages, but in
order to correct your patch, you'll need to update your source tree
anyway, right?