From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9461 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2001 20:48:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9401 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2001 20:48:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 2001 20:48:04 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id E7C835E9D8; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:49:19 -0500 (EST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes References: <20011126201945.A27754@nevyn.them.org> <20011126210231.A32203@nevyn.them.org> <1011127022440.ZM10256@ocotillo.lan> <3C031F89.70001@cygnus.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney's message of Tue, 27 Nov 2001 00:07:21 -0500 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00293.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > > I don't have any comments on Daniel's patch, but I am wondering who > > will approve this. Given that we currently have no C++ maintainer, > > should we treat Daniel's patch as an RFC and have him commit it after > > a few days if there are no objections? > > I'm pretty sure Jim Blandy, as a (most experienced?) language > maintainer, will take care of it. I'm not really qualified to be a C++ maintainer, but I'd be happy to lend Daniel a second pair of eyes for checking his patches. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Blandy To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20011126201945.A27754@nevyn.them.org> <20011126210231.A32203@nevyn.them.org> <1011127022440.ZM10256@ocotillo.lan> <3C031F89.70001@cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00508.html Message-ID: <20011127124800.QPTt71111gUQvqQOLSa_7gO1Kx7mlIbJIOJXxxUTpgg@z> Andrew Cagney writes: > > I don't have any comments on Daniel's patch, but I am wondering who > > will approve this. Given that we currently have no C++ maintainer, > > should we treat Daniel's patch as an RFC and have him commit it after > > a few days if there are no objections? > > I'm pretty sure Jim Blandy, as a (most experienced?) language > maintainer, will take care of it. I'm not really qualified to be a C++ maintainer, but I'd be happy to lend Daniel a second pair of eyes for checking his patches.