From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2773 invoked by alias); 10 May 2002 20:25:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2756 invoked from network); 10 May 2002 20:25:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 May 2002 20:25:03 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 0CFCC5EA11; Fri, 10 May 2002 15:25:01 -0500 (EST) To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: don't xfail ptype test References: <200205101913.g4AJDia18551@duracef.shout.net> From: Jim Blandy Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 13:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200205101913.g4AJDia18551@duracef.shout.net> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes: > Whoops, you've got the setup_kfail one line early in the tests. > Other than that, this patch is approved. Whoops! Thanks for reading carefully. > We're waiting on Rob Savoye right now to release a new DejaGnu > with this patch. Also I don't know if Fernando's patch is in > sourceware dejagnu or not. I'm using DejaGnu 1.42 + this patch, > so I am ready for kfail's whenever we start going live with them. So you're going to uncomment the calls to setup_kfail once there's a released DejaGnu that supports them?