From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Blandy To: dhawkins@dhawkins.dsl.frii.com Cc: gdb-patches@cygnus.com Subject: Re: bug in gdb Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 09:44:00 -0000 Message-id: References: <87n206kfz7.fsf@dhawkins.dsl.frii.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-04/msg00039.html > Found a bug in gdb. This seems to be the correct fix. (I give the > code unconditionally to the FSF for what ever they wish to do with > it..., yadda, yadda, yadda). It does not seem to warrant much > fanfare. For a change this small, we don't need a copyright assignment. It's not large enough to be copyrightable. > Changelog entry: > Fixed a bug where the typevec_size was not being reset to zero after > the typevec itself had been reset. The fix looks reasonable, but can you give me an identifier to demangle that makes the bug appear? >From shebs@cygnus.com Mon Apr 19 14:08:00 1999 From: Stan Shebs To: robertl@sco.com Cc: gdb-patches@cygnus.com Subject: Re: GDB 4.18 on SVR5: missed it by a hair Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <199904192047.NAA18881@andros.cygnus.com> References: <19990415225503.A10488@rjlhome.sco.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-04/msg00040.html Content-length: 414 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 22:55:03 -0500 From: Robert Lipe The round of optimizations we performed on configure.host didn't make it to configure.tgt. So SVR5 gets detected as SVR4.0 so it gets /proc filesystem handling silently wrong. :-( Argh! The change is in the trunk, but I forget to add it to the 4.18 branch also. Well, there's a third patch for 4.18.1... Stan From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Blandy To: dhawkins@dhawkins.dsl.frii.com Cc: gdb-patches@cygnus.com Subject: Re: bug in gdb Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 08:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <87n206kfz7.fsf@dhawkins.dsl.frii.com> X-SW-Source: 1999-q2/msg00039.html Message-ID: <19990419085200.e1zTX2ksov1SfrALg4X5WuzIxPpUm2vxBYx6XErmDrE@z> > Found a bug in gdb. This seems to be the correct fix. (I give the > code unconditionally to the FSF for what ever they wish to do with > it..., yadda, yadda, yadda). It does not seem to warrant much > fanfare. For a change this small, we don't need a copyright assignment. It's not large enough to be copyrightable. > Changelog entry: > Fixed a bug where the typevec_size was not being reset to zero after > the typevec itself had been reset. The fix looks reasonable, but can you give me an identifier to demangle that makes the bug appear?