Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp

Fernando Nasser
2001-02-15T12:41:00Z

Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> > And if he/she is a really good maintainer he/she will reject your patch
> > as it would be adding a restriction to inferior function calls that we
> > do not currently have.
>
> How do you know whether calling an inferior function uses malloc or not?
>

If it does not call a string it does not.

> You know because callfwmall.exp tests it.
>

???

--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9