From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29149 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2001 21:46:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29108 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2001 21:46:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2001 21:46:21 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 8DD925E9D8; Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:47:39 -0500 (EST) To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa/c++testsuite] Add (failing) static member function test to classes.exp References: <20011205144839.A15989@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 13:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz's message of Wed, 5 Dec 2001 14:48:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > In trying to fix some v3 fails, I found an incredibly bogus line in the > stabs reader; search for the third occurance of is_stub. "ii" can be the > name of a function, or the mangling of its parameters. The fix is trivial, > and will be attached to another one of my v3 patches once the current batch > are approved (I see no good reason to send two separate patches for the same > line). > > Here's a testcase. OK? Thanks, please commit this.