From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7598 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2001 22:53:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7577 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2001 22:53:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by hostedprojects.ges.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2001 22:53:47 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 3E2C95E9D8; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:55:04 -0500 (EST) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: document GDB's overlay support References: <20011130205837.ED4F15E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com> <8582-Fri30Nov2001235720+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> From: Jim Blandy Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 08:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: "Eli Zaretskii"'s message of Fri, 30 Nov 2001 23:57:21 +0200 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 X-SW-Source: 2001-11/txt/msg00424.txt.bz2 "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > > *** gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 2001/09/12 19:49:52 1.51 > > --- gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 2001/10/09 16:40:00 > > This patch is approved, with the following minor comments: Great, I'll assume this approval applies (with the comments) to my text-only patch as well. > > + *** makeinfo/makeinfo.c.~1~ Sun Sep 19 10:24:44 1999 > > + --- makeinfo/makeinfo.c Wed Sep 26 10:49:48 2001 > > Did you send this to the Texinfo maintainer? Yes. > If so, is this patch available in Texinfo 4.0d, the latest pretest > on alpha.gnu? I don't know. > In any case, if the only problem is that makeinfo doesn't search the > include directories for images, people could force it to DTRT by > simlpy putting the image files in the current directory, right? > Perhaps it's better to tell them to do this, instead of rebuilding > makeinfo? That would be simpler. I guess I wanted to provide instructions for putting your build system back in a "working normal" state: you type "cvs update", "configure", and "make", and things just work, without needing to remember to copy over certain files. But obviously, the instructions should mention the simpler alternative, for those less forgetful than me. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Blandy To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: document GDB's overlay support Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 14:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: <20011130205837.ED4F15E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com> <8582-Fri30Nov2001235720+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2001-11/msg00639.html Message-ID: <20011130145300.r60zXsF5_UuKFOj9Wv72R8xo1MCOWKW4cOpIpQxyo4A@z> "Eli Zaretskii" writes: > > *** gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 2001/09/12 19:49:52 1.51 > > --- gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo 2001/10/09 16:40:00 > > This patch is approved, with the following minor comments: Great, I'll assume this approval applies (with the comments) to my text-only patch as well. > > + *** makeinfo/makeinfo.c.~1~ Sun Sep 19 10:24:44 1999 > > + --- makeinfo/makeinfo.c Wed Sep 26 10:49:48 2001 > > Did you send this to the Texinfo maintainer? Yes. > If so, is this patch available in Texinfo 4.0d, the latest pretest > on alpha.gnu? I don't know. > In any case, if the only problem is that makeinfo doesn't search the > include directories for images, people could force it to DTRT by > simlpy putting the image files in the current directory, right? > Perhaps it's better to tell them to do this, instead of rebuilding > makeinfo? That would be simpler. I guess I wanted to provide instructions for putting your build system back in a "working normal" state: you type "cvs update", "configure", and "make", and things just work, without needing to remember to copy over certain files. But obviously, the instructions should mention the simpler alternative, for those less forgetful than me.