From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-12511-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 14986 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2002 19:24:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 14830 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2002 19:24:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2002 19:24:44 -0000
Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442)
	id 0BD3B5E9DE; Tue,  5 Feb 2002 14:26:18 -0500 (EST)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: complex numbers in c-valprint.c
References: <20020130233143.A21333@nevyn.them.org>
	<npk7tuw5gd.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
	<20020203175227.A26302@nevyn.them.org>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@zwingli.cygnus.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 11:24:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20020203175227.A26302@nevyn.them.org>
Message-ID: <np665bspb9.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00126.txt.bz2


Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> x + y * I, I think.  That's nice; I didn't realize C99 and <complex.h>
> supported ``I''.
> 
> OK with that syntax change?

Cool with me.