Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
	fnf@redhat.com, Mark Kettenis <kettenis@kettenis.dyndns.org>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA/stabs] Fix for line table problems (was: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <np663ppzrq.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C98F14B.7040504@cygnus.com>


Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> > [This is long.  Feel free to skip to the patch at the very end, and
> > stop to take a gander at the testsuite numbers in the middle :)]
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:20:05PM -0700, Fred Fish wrote:
> >
> >> > Fred, could you look into these failures?
> >
> >> Yes, but I would need access to a host system that exhibits
> >> the failures.  Given a pointer and access to such a system,
> >> I can try and see what is going on.
> > I've got it.  It's almost exactly like the bug I fixed in binutils
> > addr2line a few hours ago.  We do not have an N_SLINE at the beginning
> > of the function.  Our starting lines for functions have, as a result,
> > always been a little odd...
> 
> Jim, would you be able to bump this one up a bit on your things to do
> list?  I believe it addresses the regressions MichaelC detected just
> prior to 5.2 being branched and is on the high priority list.

Yes, I've been sort of panicing this week, but I think this might be
valuable to the project I'm currenty panicing about.  I'll probably
get to it today.


  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-21 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-12 16:28 [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak Fred Fish
2002-02-13  7:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-21 12:50 ` Jim Blandy
2002-02-23 13:37   ` Mark Kettenis
2002-02-27 13:43     ` Jim Blandy
2002-02-27 15:24       ` Fred Fish
2002-03-16 22:51         ` [RFA/stabs] Fix for line table problems (was: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak) Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-03-18 13:44           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-03-20 12:30           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-21 10:00             ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2002-03-21 11:03           ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-21 12:56             ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-25 14:37               ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-21 12:57             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-03-21 15:28               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-25  9:58 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-03-27 21:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-29 10:35   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-03-29 12:59     ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-03 18:59       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-04 14:34         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
     [not found]       ` <20020329160533.A24451@nevyn.them.org>
2002-04-04 13:51         ` Jim Blandy
2002-04-04 14:25           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-03-29 13:21 Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=np663ppzrq.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com \
    --to=jimb@redhat.com \
    --cc=ac131313@cygnus.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=fnf@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@kettenis.dyndns.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox