From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22697 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2001 03:46:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22665 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2001 03:46:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2001 03:46:31 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 76C905E9D8; Sat, 8 Dec 2001 22:47:48 -0500 (EST) To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: clean up logic in linux_child_wait References: <20011208040632.8D2455E9D8@zwingli.cygnus.com> <20011207231240.A18761@nevyn.them.org> <20011208132652.A4190@nevyn.them.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2001 19:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Daniel Jacobowitz's message of Sat, 8 Dec 2001 13:26:52 -0500 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34 X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00240.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > Well, the only thing that dies horribly is the three testsuite > > failures I was trying to resolve. > > > > Do you want my job? > > Sorry for my tone there. No, no, there was nothing wrong with your tone. Your suggestion was quick, simplified the code, and relieved me of the responsibility to track down some bugs that, at the time I posted, I had no real idea where I was going to go with. So I'm quite grateful. The joke was that my work might get done better if you were doing it. :) > On Oct. 14, Mark Kettenis checked in a patch that was intended to make > all Linux targets use lin-lwp instead of linux-thread. The fact that > S/390 still was afterwards was probably just an oversight; S/390 now > contains the only reference to that file out of any port. Yeah, I figured there was some kind of history behind it.