From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC: C/C++ preprocessor macro support for GDB
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 20:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <np4rjdw50y.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020318183339.GB19897@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
Instead of the bug you guessed, here's the bug I actually do have:
(gdb) show macro A
Defined at /home/jimb/gdb/macros/play/test.c:12
#define A(x) x
(gdb) show macro B
Defined at /home/jimb/gdb/macros/play/test.c:12
#define B(x) A
(gdb) macro expand B(ignored)(passed through)
expands to: A(passed through)
(gdb)
ISO/IEC 9899:1999(E) 6.10.3.4 para 1: "Then, the resulting
preprocessing token sequence is rescanned, along with all subsequent
preprocessing tokens of the source file, for more macro names to
replace." It's the "along with all subsequent PP tokens" part that I
got wrong.
(Did I mention that I think we should replace macroexp.c with libcpp?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-19 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-16 22:23 Jim Blandy
2002-03-17 0:11 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-03-17 19:33 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-17 4:46 ` Neil Booth
2002-03-17 20:35 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-17 23:29 ` Neil Booth
2002-03-18 0:06 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-18 0:36 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-03-18 5:00 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-18 5:32 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-18 11:18 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-18 12:09 ` Neil Booth
2002-03-18 10:45 ` Neil Booth
2002-03-18 11:45 ` Stan Shebs
2002-03-18 12:05 ` Neil Booth
2002-03-18 12:19 ` Stan Shebs
2002-03-18 15:45 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-18 7:16 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-17 9:07 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-17 16:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-03-18 7:35 ` Batons? Was: " Andrew Cagney
2002-03-18 12:08 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-18 12:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-18 15:49 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-18 7:39 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-03-19 13:16 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-18 10:34 ` Neil Booth
2002-03-18 11:11 ` Neil Booth
2002-03-18 16:03 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-18 17:42 ` Stan Shebs
2002-03-18 19:51 ` Jim Blandy
2002-03-18 23:23 ` Neil Booth
2002-03-18 20:33 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2002-03-23 12:14 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=np4rjdw50y.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox