From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30311 invoked by alias); 25 Mar 2002 22:37:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30281 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2002 22:37:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2002 22:37:20 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 5DF185EA11; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:37:19 -0500 (EST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , fnf@redhat.com, Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/stabs] Fix for line table problems (was: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak) References: <200202272320.g1RNK5e14347@fishpond.ninemoons.com> <20020317014816.B1589@nevyn.them.org> <3C9A48F2.9020108@cygnus.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3C9A48F2.9020108@cygnus.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00473.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > > This looks sound to me. Let's put it in and see what happens. > > Was that trunk or branch? I can understand a suck-it-and-see approach > for the trunk but not for the branch :-/ I have to admit, changes to this area of code have further-reaching effects than I usually expect. Definitely for the trunk. Perhaps if someone tracks down the regressions that Daniel noted, we could include it in the branch, too.