From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Does anybody remember...
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 10:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <np4rgxnkgk.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CEEC758.2B52BB2A@redhat.com>
Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com> writes:
> Does anybody remember a Harvard Architecture issue, wherein you did
> something
> like take the address of a function, which caused gdb to scrunch the
> address
> down into the target-pointer format and then re-expand it into the
> unified-address
> format, with possible loss of information in the process?
>
> I think Jim Blandy did something to prevent this from happening,
> but it seems to have crept back in again.
Here's what I think you're referring to, from values.c. The comment
only talks about non-Harvard architectures, but `descriptors' are also
used often in Harvard architectures to keep data and function pointers
the same size even when the code space is much larger than the data
space.
/* Extract a value as a C pointer. Does not deallocate the value.
Note that val's type may not actually be a pointer; value_as_long
handles all the cases. */
CORE_ADDR
value_as_address (struct value *val)
{
/* Assume a CORE_ADDR can fit in a LONGEST (for now). Not sure
whether we want this to be true eventually. */
#if 0
/* ADDR_BITS_REMOVE is wrong if we are being called for a
non-address (e.g. argument to "signal", "info break", etc.), or
for pointers to char, in which the low bits *are* significant. */
return ADDR_BITS_REMOVE (value_as_long (val));
#else
/* There are several targets (IA-64, PowerPC, and others) which
don't represent pointers to functions as simply the address of
the function's entry point. For example, on the IA-64, a
function pointer points to a two-word descriptor, generated by
the linker, which contains the function's entry point, and the
value the IA-64 "global pointer" register should have --- to
support position-independent code. The linker generates
descriptors only for those functions whose addresses are taken.
On such targets, it's difficult for GDB to convert an arbitrary
function address into a function pointer; it has to either find
an existing descriptor for that function, or call malloc and
build its own. On some targets, it is impossible for GDB to
build a descriptor at all: the descriptor must contain a jump
instruction; data memory cannot be executed; and code memory
cannot be modified.
Upon entry to this function, if VAL is a value of type `function'
(that is, TYPE_CODE (VALUE_TYPE (val)) == TYPE_CODE_FUNC), then
VALUE_ADDRESS (val) is the address of the function. This is what
you'll get if you evaluate an expression like `main'. The call
to COERCE_ARRAY below actually does all the usual unary
conversions, which includes converting values of type `function'
to `pointer to function'. This is the challenging conversion
discussed above. Then, `unpack_long' will convert that pointer
back into an address.
So, suppose the user types `disassemble foo' on an architecture
with a strange function pointer representation, on which GDB
cannot build its own descriptors, and suppose further that `foo'
has no linker-built descriptor. The address->pointer conversion
will signal an error and prevent the command from running, even
though the next step would have been to convert the pointer
directly back into the same address.
The following shortcut avoids this whole mess. If VAL is a
function, just return its address directly. */
if (TYPE_CODE (VALUE_TYPE (val)) == TYPE_CODE_FUNC
|| TYPE_CODE (VALUE_TYPE (val)) == TYPE_CODE_METHOD)
return VALUE_ADDRESS (val);
COERCE_ARRAY (val);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-25 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-24 17:02 Michael Snyder
2002-05-25 10:54 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2002-05-29 17:02 ` Michael Snyder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=np4rgxnkgk.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox