From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25221 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2002 23:22:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25204 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2002 23:22:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zwingli.cygnus.com) (208.245.165.35) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2002 23:22:55 -0000 Received: by zwingli.cygnus.com (Postfix, from userid 442) id 9E19C5EA11; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 18:22:53 -0500 (EST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] block_innermost_frame tweak References: <20020620131440.M397@gnat.com> <3D126D8A.9020908@cygnus.com> <3D138B65.8070401@cygnus.com> <3D13AEE9.10209@cygnus.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 16:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3D13AEE9.10209@cygnus.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-06/txt/msg00454.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > Oops, I guess we're back to frame_address_in_block() then? Sure thing.