From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 59813 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2019 21:43:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 59805 invoked by uid 89); 9 Dec 2019 21:43:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-14.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy= X-HELO: mail.bob131.so Received: from server2.bob131.so (HELO mail.bob131.so) (128.199.153.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 21:43:17 +0000 Received: from internal.mail.bob131.so (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bob131.so (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228D652C27; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:43:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.bob131.so 228D652C27 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bob131.so; s=default; t=1575927795; bh=3RR/4dGB3MBl3CebnRw8+dyQFHDwYz4izGRoLCVhH0c=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=m2tMKmmNv+/r2xJsDOsd+jJRiFWJZWyUKEBubUqfLOemub1au5Bb4lC7ZrMsv9ogG OekqFlhCW0vEXSPmcvzCQ3ae+iC8qLgZQOcgUGE2yqB2hMEa6ljw5KCFOzrqlyq9vw FJ+o0FlYmFJ1LX2+NZCqq5+FePG6kGoh5HymoTmLPYOeBPMIPrFu8YQe1A8rz8BN2K gnn1UCoXl6HVxTdZGF0BdwnpprVeTQH3NTY9iEQZcf2AtYVf1bEJThbGrT0Fp6uEwW 5bhlit9qz7J32JYl3l+xWoBR/3kEGBap3vCqUgBC08SbCQyKsFdc+q5+nMmfRcPssl tH74YxED4GSmw== Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 21:43:00 -0000 From: George Barrett To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix scripted probe breakpoints Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg00362.txt.bz2 On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 04:37:47PM -0500, Simon Marchi wrote: > so would you like me to push the patch on your behalf? Yes, please. > I found some other really small nits, I'll fix them before pushing if I end > up pushing for you. > I missed this last time, but also in GNU style we compare pointers and > integers explicitly, so either one of these would be good: > I would change null to NULL or nullptr to match the language nomenclature. > non-zero -> true I appreciate the tips, sorry for the additional round-trips. Thank you for your patience and speedy review!