From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-76622-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24967 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2010 22:38:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 24912 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2010 22:38:35 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (74.125.121.35)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:38:20 +0000
Received: from kpbe12.cbf.corp.google.com (kpbe12.cbf.corp.google.com [172.25.105.76])	by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id oANMcHNa029878	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:38:17 -0800
Received: from pvg12 (pvg12.prod.google.com [10.241.210.140])	by kpbe12.cbf.corp.google.com with ESMTP id oANMbHRI015885	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:38:15 -0800
Received: by pvg12 with SMTP id 12so4269978pvg.40        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:38:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.185.1 with SMTP id i1mr7517285wff.142.1290551895421;        Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:38:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from coign.google.com ([216.239.45.130])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f5sm5169219wfg.14.2010.11.23.14.38.12        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);        Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:38:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, Doug Evans <dje@google.com>,        gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Support -fsplit-stack (previous frame inner to this frame)
References: <20101123001325.GA11983@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>	<AANLkTikii4W0-s809vmd_1FECiDHy1+JmO=c9nPefkid@mail.gmail.com>	<20101123021159.GA19258@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>	<m3k4k33h9q.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:38:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <m3k4k33h9q.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue,	23 Nov 2010 13:40:49 -0700")
Message-ID: <mcraakzu0mk.fsf@google.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-System-Of-Record: true
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00379.txt.bz2

Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

> Is it impossible for __morestack to appear in multiple objfiles?

The __morestack function has hidden visibility when using ELF, so if
both the executable and a shared library are compiled with -fsplit-stack
they will each have their own copy of __morestack.

Ian