From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23497 invoked by alias); 23 May 2012 18:31:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 23486 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2012 18:31:12 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-pb0-f41.google.com) (209.85.160.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2012 18:31:00 +0000 Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so10897492pbb.0 for ; Wed, 23 May 2012 11:30:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=6JS0v9wXKVCAF7GnP8qraUlQVe1kP0VMdVReAOVAPps=; b=Ny2czIvMuFiHnJuLEwGKTJZoIsiFfTsW8W6tXnobCmtKZHIUQKT9+FUzGAxBZ0G5BL 0qGJu6C6v4XTws3KlQrzwCoV4Zt4zfb6iiD4CRJsYwE6Lsr5HTcEY1gDQEzxi1IP2Jwc okYIO8VKXPy9jsyiJOYxeCJGQ+LV5kiXNTa+X5Z0IcvKV1vmSCPPBDo4XmZNyvzjSBra Ik0+Qr3Vb9u7Xo5WPsJuosBxYObdZ9W+UAw5xCrbAkxub7nLJxNLmiMMKsqNAMoqXXAi Jojxcxdbpz7m69Ht0fsrMXdZoTVsi1sBhOZfS2eBsUSakxV3eN0mX3hOclYSKhc9PLo/ 4Kbw== Received: by 10.68.132.199 with SMTP id ow7mr11801427pbb.144.1337797859876; Wed, 23 May 2012 11:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.132.199 with SMTP id ow7mr11801361pbb.144.1337797859498; Wed, 23 May 2012 11:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from coign.google.com ([216.239.45.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id po10sm2620719pbb.21.2012.05.23.11.30.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 May 2012 11:30:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Ian Lance Taylor To: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) Cc: gcc-patches@sourcware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] leb128.h: Umm, how about int64_t? References: <20120523164123.099BD2461B1@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 18:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120523164123.099BD2461B1@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> (Doug Evans's message of "Wed, 23 May 2012 09:41:22 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlb6Y8FVX2A6jCkkkOsboT5CVvvO+9NFJgcXDw2MU4owpOWkvsR4Gay1QJhQdi5gbEfs1DRq/2RMOOSfNJyjlg9D3EA2DEuWC5hPpWgfx0Q1mQdSgtzO2P3knr9WsATkrCWpc0F/46xSCUIkEA9KB6gdiLyuTQoRc566dyUcf51uQ9i8OE= Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00913.txt.bz2 dje@google.com (Doug Evans) writes: > 2012-05-23 Doug Evans > > * leb128.h: #include stdint.h, inttypes.h. > (read_uleb128_to_uint64): Renamed from read_uleb128_to_ull. > Change to take a uint64_t * argument instead of unsigned long long. > (read_sleb128_to_uint64): Renamed from read_sleb128_to_ll. > Change to take an int64_t * argument instead of long long. This is OK. Thanks. Ian