From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19901 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2008 20:33:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 19851 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jul 2008 20:33:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:33:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6EKXMJk028442 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:33:22 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6EKXLJ1003180; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:33:21 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-60.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.60]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6EKXL00023879; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:33:21 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C43AC378147; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:33:20 -0600 (MDT) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: vladimir@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Remove gdb-events References: <20080714171004.GC3998@adacore.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20080714171004.GC3998@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon\, 14 Jul 2008 10\:10\:04 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00294.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> My thought on this is that the observers should be installed Joel> permanently and should have a way of determining whether the Joel> current interpreter is the one they have been installed for Joel> before doing anything else. Ok. Either way is fine by me -- I'll implement whatever Vladimir says. Joel> The gdbtk team will probably be grateful that you took a look at their Joel> code, but it's actually maintained by a different group, with a different Joel> discussion list. I took a look, and the changes certainly look reasonable. Joel> Let's send them a copy of the gdbtk patch (insight@sourceware.org) when Joel> we're happy about the changes in GDB. I sent a note and Keith replied, saying that this patch is ok. Joel> Let's isolate the Makefile.in changes related to gdbtk and send them Joel> to the insight list together with your other gdbtk changes. So -- you would want this patch separated into two commits? I am happy to do that, but it seems weird. Logically it is a single change. I will address your other comments and submit an updated patch once I hear back from Vladimir and, possibly, the TUI maintainer. thanks, Tom