From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-61901-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 758 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2009 15:24:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 426 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Mar 2009 15:24:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:24:33 +0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n22FOUqg030158 	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:24:30 -0500
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) 	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n22FOXOT022853 	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:24:33 -0500
Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-5.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.5]) 	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n22FOVD8032449; 	Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:24:31 -0500
Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) 	id 626A78880CE; Mon,  2 Mar 2009 08:24:24 -0700 (MST)
To: Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix SIGSEGV in gdb when printing ctor of non-virtual   class
References: <ga6bmt$6li$1@ger.gmane.org> <48DD1C8A.7030206@qnx.com> 	<gogqdi$qfm$1@ger.gmane.org>
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 15:24:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <gogqdi$qfm$1@ger.gmane.org> (Aleksandar Ristovski's message of "Mon\, 02 Mar 2009 09\:28\:01 -0500")
Message-ID: <m3zlg4uevs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Aleksandar" == Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski@qnx.com> writes:

Aleksandar> An old patch. Gdb still SIGSEGV on this testcase, but I
Aleksandar> haven't got any replies.

Aleksandar> +      /* Constructors of non-virtual classes will not have block.  */

This seems weird.  Is this a gcc bug or something?

Should this somehow be fixed elsewhere?  I don't know.

Aleksandar> +	  release_value (v);

I don't think you want release_value here.  You can just drop the
value, it will automatically be freed later.

Tom