From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17602 invoked by alias); 24 Jun 2009 19:41:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 17594 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Jun 2009 19:41:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:41:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5OJfOVb002664; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:41:24 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5OJfNAG017600; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:41:23 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-198.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.198]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5OJfM0H030796; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:41:22 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 33F953785E4; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:41:20 -0600 (MDT) To: Doug Evans Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [10/15] Basic value access routines References: <200906151658.n5FGwrN6026829@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20090624154618.GA1825@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Wed\, 24 Jun 2009 09\:25\:56 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00662.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" =3D=3D Doug Evans writes: Daniel> There's plenty of identical types within a single objfile. =C2=A0Lo= ad GDB Daniel> with -readnow, and I find 66 copies of the typedef for "FILE", for Daniel> instance. Thanks. It seems like interning types is something we could do right away then. Doug> Until my comdat types patch is vetted more, these numbers are to be Doug> taken with a grain of salt, but they are promising. Yes, this is very interesting. Tom