From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18596 invoked by alias); 18 Aug 2009 16:39:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 18588 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Aug 2009 16:39:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:39:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7IGdCUT023507 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:39:12 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7IGcpwV021806 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:38:51 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7IGcner014069; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:38:50 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6AA113782CC; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:38:49 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Ralf Wildenhues Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: rda build on x86_64 References: <20090818053514.GC28254@gmx.de> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20090818053514.GC28254@gmx.de> (Ralf Wildenhues's message of "Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:35:14 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Wildenhues writes: Ralf> Until then, would it be desirable to let toplevel not configure the rda Ralf> directory on x86_64 to avoid this build error (so the user doesn't have Ralf> to --disable-rda manually)? FWIW I think most people working on gdb just don't check out rda. You have to ask for it explicitly, it isn't in any of the other modules from what I can see. I think it would be reasonable to make the change you suggest, but only if you are really motivated to do so. Tom