From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24731 invoked by alias); 22 Oct 2009 18:21:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 24722 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Oct 2009 18:21:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:21:42 +0000 Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9MILeTl007261 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:21:40 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9MILddT010826; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:21:40 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9MILdZJ003546; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:21:39 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C4703378534; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:21:38 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] debug-file-directory with multiple components References: <20091021231039.GD2658@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20091021231039.GD2658@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:10:39 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-10/txt/msg00530.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> for various reasons `debug-file-directory' would be sometimes Jan> useful to have multiple components such as `solib-search-path' has. This seems reasonable to me. Jan> It should be a backward compatible extension as DIRNAME_SEPARATOR Jan> should never be a valid part of a single DEBUG_FILE_DIRECTORY Jan> component. Why is that? It doesn't seem really impossible to me, just unlikely. FWIW, I don't think this should actually block this patch. If this were a real problem we would need a solution to it anywhere we have a list of directories. The code bits look ok to me. But, please wait a few days to see if there are any objections. Tom