From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24707 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2011 21:17:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 24699 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Feb 2011 21:17:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:17:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1BLH91N031316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:17:09 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1BLH9KI032105; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:17:09 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1BLH86i021030; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:17:08 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2D079378338; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:17:08 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Michael Snyder Cc: Pedro Alves , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [rfa] clean up output of "info set" command. References: <4D5599E8.6030408@vmware.com> <201102112042.45033.pedro@codesourcery.com> <4D55A1A4.5020208@vmware.com> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4D55A1A4.5020208@vmware.com> (Michael Snyder's message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:52:52 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Snyder writes: Pedro> Isn't there a property of the command we could check Pedro> instead of hardcoding specific command names? Michael> I'm open to suggestions. The only property I can think of is that Michael> there is no corresponding entry in "setlist". I could search Michael> setlist every time... You could stick a new flag on the command object. Or there is cmd_cfunc_eq, which is used for a similar purpose in some places. I don't think this is super, but OTOH it isn't any worse than existing code. Tom