From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3840 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 3770 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2011 19:34:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:34:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p27JYJlu026967 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:34:19 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p27JYIJ2032103; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:34:18 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p27JYHi3013153; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:34:18 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 985CB378339; Mon, 7 Mar 2011 12:34:17 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Add support for VxWorks (v3) References: <1299219720-13398-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2011 19:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1299219720-13398-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 01:21:40 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00486.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> - I moved the "command_post" observer, and then renamed it Joel> to "toplevel_command_post". It seemed clearer that way. Joel> I'm not completely sure that users are going to like the fact Joel> that partition switch notices are no longer printed when that Joel> happens inside a script or a command, but I think that'll be OK, Joel> and I can deal with that then if they comment on it. If you think the other approach is what users want, then you should keep it. I think it would be strange, but I am not a user of this system am I am really just guessing. Tom