From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24901 invoked by alias); 27 May 2011 20:09:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 24882 invoked by uid 22791); 27 May 2011 20:09:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 May 2011 20:09:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4RK9Fkh032755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 May 2011 16:09:15 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4RK9FwB014372; Fri, 27 May 2011 16:09:15 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p4RK9EjB021732; Fri, 27 May 2011 16:09:15 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E36E73781BA; Fri, 27 May 2011 14:09:13 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Kevin Pouget Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle multiple breakpoint hits in Python interface References: Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 20:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Pouget's message of "Mon, 23 May 2011 05:38:54 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00656.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin Pouget writes: Kevin> I put back the breakpoint attribute in addition to the "breakpoints" Kevin> sequence and added in the documentation that it was "legacy support", Kevin> is it okay for you? Yes. Many of your patches seem ready to me. A couple still may need doc review. IIRC, your paperwork isn't done yet, so at this point we must wait for that. I don't recall when you sent things in, if it has been a while you might consider pinging the FSF copyright clerk. Tom