From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19430 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2011 23:40:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 19420 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Aug 2011 23:40:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:39:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p72NdrGn028929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:39:53 -0400 Received: from psique ([10.3.112.5]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p72NdlYh030844; Tue, 2 Aug 2011 19:39:49 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Abhijit Halder , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] An implementation of pipe to make I/O communication between gdb and shell. References: <20110802065411.GA23915@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110802154450.GA19759@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 23:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110802154450.GA19759@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 2 Aug 2011 17:44:50 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 Jan Kratochvil writes: > Sure maybe "pipe" is no longer the right name and "redirect" or so matches the > functionality better. FWIW I think that, given the current status of the patch, `redirect' is better than `pipe', indeed.