From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5555 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2011 16:58:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 5547 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Oct 2011 16:58:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:58:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p94GwMlE008440 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:58:22 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p94GwMVN011644; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:58:22 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p94GwKcH027336; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:58:21 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Aleksandar Ristovski Cc: Subject: Re: patch: solib_break from _r_debug.r_brk References: <4E847A11.6080800@redhat.com> <4E8A1D11.3070006@qnx.com> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4E8A1D11.3070006@qnx.com> (Aleksandar Ristovski's message of "Mon, 3 Oct 2011 16:37:37 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Aleksandar" == Aleksandar Ristovski writes: Aleksandar> Tom, thanks for looking into this, but I have meanwhile done Aleksandar> further testing on gnu/linux and uncovered that it is not Aleksandar> worth pursuing. While it works for us, it doesn't on Aleksandar> gnu/linux and I am not sure it can be made generic enough to Aleksandar> defend it: Aleksandar> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-10/msg00043.html Aleksandar> Sorry about that. No problem. Somehow I didn't see that message. I think we can always make things work. E.g., we could make this OS-dependent, say via gdbarch. Whether you want to take the time is really up to you. Tom