From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: <Paul_Koning@Dell.com>
Cc: <dje@google.com>, <khooyp@cs.umd.edu>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Handle SIGINT in Python
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3zkdu3prv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD030F1EAD9E@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> (Paul Koning's message of "Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:03:08 -0600")
>>>>> "Paul" == <Paul_Koning@Dell.com> writes:
Paul> To get what you're asking (C-c work like in non-Python settings in
Paul> GDB) all that would be needed is for the interpreter top level to
Paul> check for specifically the KeyboardInterrupt exception and give that
Paul> to the GDB C-c handler, rather than printing the default exception
Paul> traceback. It would still do that for other (non-interrupt)
Paul> exceptions.
I think there are basically 2 cases to consider: does the SIGINT arrive
in Python code, or in GDB code?
In GDB code, the SIGINT handler should be handle_sigint. (AFAIK --
there may be other situations, and I'm not familiar with all of them).
This sets quit_flag. Then, appropriate spots in GDB invoke QUIT, which
checks this flag and calls 'fatal' if it is set. fatal just throws a
RETURN_QUIT exception.
In Python code, <mumble> is the SIGINT handler. I believe it calls
PyErr_SetInterrupt. Then Python does something similar: it checks this
flag periodically and turns it into a KeyboardInterrupt exception.
We are already pretty good at converting GDB exceptions to Python
exceptions. gdbpy_convert_exception handles the RETURN_QUIT ->
KeyboardInterrupt case already.
We are pretty bad at converting Python exceptions to GDB exceptions.
See:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12174
This is the problem where we lose information in exception round-trips.
So, one idea would be to make this better: fix the round-trip problem,
and convert KeyboardInterrupt to RETURN_QUIT, then find all the
Python->GDB boundaries and make them deal with this as appropriate.
Perhaps we could also just have a single SIGINT handler that can handle
all cases. I am not sure.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-11 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-10 21:31 Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-10 21:47 ` Doug Evans
2012-01-10 22:09 ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11 20:59 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-11 21:06 ` Paul_Koning
2012-01-11 21:23 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-01-12 0:54 ` Doug Evans
2012-01-12 15:52 ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-12 16:48 ` Paul_Koning
2012-01-13 10:55 ` Kevin Pouget
2012-01-13 12:11 ` Paul_Koning
2012-01-10 21:49 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-11 21:15 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-11 21:49 ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-11 22:46 ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-20 21:40 ` Tom Tromey
2012-01-22 16:36 ` Khoo Yit Phang
2012-01-22 20:54 ` Khoo Yit Phang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3zkdu3prv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=Paul_Koning@Dell.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=khooyp@cs.umd.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox