From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 964 invoked by alias); 3 Jun 2010 19:36:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 773 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jun 2010 19:36:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:35:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o53JZgLJ002448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:35:43 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o53JZg6T003602; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:35:42 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o53JZf9N011926; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:35:41 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2C6D03782DC; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 13:35:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: dje@google.com (Doug Evans) Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] add note on command naming to gdbint.texi References: <20100603181353.E965584396@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 19:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100603181353.E965584396@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> (Doug Evans's message of "Thu, 3 Jun 2010 11:13:53 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> I'd like to add this to the Coding section of gdbint.texi. Doug> +GDB U/I commands are written @samp{foo-bar}, not @samp{foo_bar}. I wonder whether we also have a rule about when to use a hyphen versus when to use a subcommand. I don't think that impacts whether this patch should go in. Tom