From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19049 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2010 21:56:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 19041 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Sep 2010 21:56:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:55:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8LLtrBD021860 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:55:54 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8LLtrYq024215; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:55:53 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8LLtqhg024157; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:55:52 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E7E75378875; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:55:51 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Serge CHATROUX Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: GDB 7.2 - Patch proposal for the use of GDB/Python scripts on MinGW References: <4C8DE078.4090309@st.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:50:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Serge CHATROUX's message of "Fri, 17 Sep 2010 15:10:26 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00360.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Serge" == Serge CHATROUX writes: Serge> In order to submit a new corrected patch, should I start a new Serge> mail thread or do I continue to use this mail thread? I think it is slightly clearer to start a new thread for new patches (referring back to the older thread by URL if needed to explain some context); but really either way is ok with me. Tom