From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1597 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2011 16:57:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 1578 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Oct 2011 16:57:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:57:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p93Gv3IG023875 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:57:03 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p93Gv33P024377; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:57:03 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p93Gv1GP026170; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:57:01 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [MI RFC] entryval: MI access to entry values [Re: [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full] References: <20110718201852.GG30496@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110902170745.GA22738@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:57:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110902170745.GA22738@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Fri, 2 Sep 2011 19:07:45 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> For (2) and (3) for FEs with proper parser an additional result Jan> should be ignored correctly. For FEs with some ugly manual Jan> matching I also do not think it should be a problem as FEs are Jan> usually used for -O0 -g code debugging while entry values are Jan> present only in -O2 -g code. For the record, I think we should not concern ourselves at all with such MI consumers, if any exist. MI has flaws, but this isn't among them; we should expect consumers to reliably ignore new fields. Tom