From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-87175-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13835 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2012 19:38:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 13827 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2012 19:38:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:37:53 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0GJbqKP029615	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:37:52 -0500
Received: from psique ([10.3.112.11])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0GJbmDn010819;	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:37:50 -0500
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] Language independent bits
References: <m3k44s7qej.fsf@gmail.com> <m3aa5o7q3k.fsf@gmail.com>	<20120115203420.GA18901@host2.jankratochvil.net>	<m3obu3pmle.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
X-URL: http://www.redhat.com
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:39:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <m3obu3pmle.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Mon,	16 Jan 2012 10:46:05 -0700")
Message-ID: <m3y5t7cub8.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00572.txt.bz2

On Monday, January 16 2012, Tom Tromey wrote:

>>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
>
>>> +    int expout_size;
> Jan> Memory object size does not fit into `int', it should be `size_t'.
>
> I agree, but I think that mixing different kinds of refactorings into
> one patch can be unnecessarily complicated and confusing.  The 'int' is
> already there today.

I already replaced `int' by `size_t'.  Do you want me to revert the change?