From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3972 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2013 18:05:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 3959 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2013 18:05:47 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:05:47 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8AI5eTe012510 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:05:40 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-171.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.171]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r8AI5bjP013057 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:05:39 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Philippe Waroquiers Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA [PATCH] Implement 'catch syscall' for gdbserver References: <1377876388.3041.3.camel@soleil> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:05:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1377876388.3041.3.camel@soleil> (Philippe Waroquiers's message of "Fri, 30 Aug 2013 17:26:28 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00343.txt.bz2 On Friday, August 30 2013, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > This is the 2nd version of the patch implementing 'catch syscalls' for > gdbserver. > First version was sent in an RFC (no feedback yet, so here is a completed > and tested RFA ready version). > Tested (no regression) on linux amd64, native and gdbserver. > Manually tested with a patched Valgrind gdbserver. Haven't tested it yet (was/am going to review it), but as we have discussed on IRC, you might want to take a look at . Not that you should fix it, but probably see how it affects this feature on gdbserver. Thanks, -- Sergio