From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6278 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2009 19:22:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 6267 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Apr 2009 19:22:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:22:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3MJJw70020438; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:19:59 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3MJJuRm008109; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:19:56 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-14-158.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.158]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n3MJJtvd015724; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:19:55 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6711D37829A; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:19:54 -0600 (MDT) To: Jonas Maebe Cc: gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [patch] Set calling convention of methods References: <7B6EF4DA-76C8-4D9C-8B9F-94153EF1C4E1@elis.ugent.be> <691B0BA8-C606-42FF-A796-76CC9C31556A@elis.ugent.be> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <691B0BA8-C606-42FF-A796-76CC9C31556A@elis.ugent.be> (Jonas Maebe's message of "Wed\, 22 Apr 2009 19\:45\:22 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00606.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jonas" == Jonas Maebe writes: Jonas> I'd prefer my i386 Borland fastcall patch to be committed first Jonas> though, since changing this calling convention stuff would also Jonas> affect that patch. Is that possible given my current Jonas> in-progress state as far as the copyright assignment process is Jonas> concerned? I think it is too big to be accepted until the paperwork is finalized. At least, if we are talking about: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-04/msg00057.html The usual rule is that more than 10 lines of code require paperwork. Tom