From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9308 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2010 18:46:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 9232 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Nov 2010 18:46:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:46:17 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oACIkGmg024312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:46:16 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oACIkGiA022403; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:46:16 -0500 Received: from parfait.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oACIkFie010223; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 13:46:15 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] Code cleanup: New init_one_comp_unit References: <20101107035032.GA8598@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20101112184333.GA17824@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:46:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20101112184333.GA17824@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:43:34 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00161.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> I have prepared a second patch now to address Joel's suggestion to Jan> rather look up symbols case insensitively instead of lowercasing Jan> them on read-in. I'll be interested to see that. Jan> But maybe this patch is OK anyway although the cleanup could be Jan> more complete. Jan> (Not yet checked in.) Either way is ok by me. Tom