From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31511 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2010 19:01:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 31498 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Nov 2010 19:01:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:01:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAGJ0wgp002157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:00:58 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAGJ0vA8030915; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:00:58 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAGJ0vg2004293; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:00:57 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1AE753784EE; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:00:56 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: pmuldoon@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PR Python/12212 References: Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Phil Muldoon's message of "Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:47:01 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg00208.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon writes: Phil> Oops I did not notice that the documentation. In that case the only Phil> change is to py-inferior.c, and I can delete the changes to Phil> py-infthread.c. Do you want me to generate a new patch, or should I Phil> just go ahead check that change in? It would be nice to have a regression test for the crash. Tom